The Philosophical and Pedagogical Potential of AI-Generated Mathematics-Themed Philosophy for Children (P4C) Stories

Main Article Content

Nihan Akkocaoğlu Çayır

Abstract

The growing role of artificial intelligence (AI) in education requires teacher candidates to reconsider their philosophical and pedagogical ways of thinking. This study examines the philosophical and pedagogical potential of AI-generated stories designed for Philosophy for Children (P4C) with a mathematics focus. Adopting a descriptive research design based on document analysis, four short stories (two by ChatGPT and two by Gemini) generated under the same prompt were evaluated by three experts according to seven criteria derived from the P4C literature. Quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were interpreted using descriptive analysis based on expert commentaries.


Findings indicate that ChatGPT-generated stories scored higher than those by Gemini in philosophical potential, inquiry dynamics, openness to multiple perspectives, aesthetic–narrative appeal, creativity–imagination, age appropriateness, and connectivity. Qualitative analyses showed that ChatGPT stories effectively transformed abstract mathematical concepts (e.g., “one,” “zero”) into age-appropriate and metaphorically rich narratives, while Gemini stories, though aesthetically and emotionally appealing, required greater facilitation to sustain philosophical dialogue.


Overall, the results suggest that AI-generated stories can serve not only as “philosophical stimuli” in P4C classrooms but also as reflective and pedagogical tools for teacher and facilitator education through activities such as text analysis, philosophical rewriting, and inquiry-based reflection.

Article Details

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Akkocaoğlu Çayır, N. (2026). The Philosophical and Pedagogical Potential of AI-Generated Mathematics-Themed Philosophy for Children (P4C) Stories. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Interdisciplinary Practices, 1(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18435649